Thursday, March 20, 2014

Coldest Place in Universe!

About 5,000 light years away, the Boomerang Nebula is the coldest object known.




Works Cited

Big Bang Confirmed?

     Not exactly. However, as new studies have found, new ripples of cosmic microwave background may gives us more insight on the true details of the occurrences during the big bang.


   Check out the articles below.


Works Cited

Eta Carinae

Eta Carinae is a stellar system in the constellation Carina. It is located about 7,500 to 8,000 light years away from Earth (so its parallax angle is about 0.435 to 0.408 micro arc seconds since 1 parsec = 3.262 light years) with a mass equivalent to that of about 100 solar masses. Its luminosity is known to be about a million times brighter than the sun! It is currently one the biggest and brightest stars in our galaxy. Astronomers who have studied its history and its present conditions suspect it to be a major supernova candidate that could erupt any day now.

History
In the 19th century, its apparent brightness dramatically increased for two decades, then decreased. This period of time was known as the “great eruption.” No one is absolutely sure on the cause of this eruption. Also parts of the cloud of dust and gas in the two big globes that surround it today are believed to have been released during this dramatic increase in brightness. In 1843 it flared up and became the second brightest star in the sky, after Sirius. It remained this way for about 20 years and then faded, leaving a cloud of gas called the Homunculus Nebula. Eta Carinae has lost about 10% of its substance during that event. Astronomers have called this a “supernova impostor.” After this it returned to be quiet, for an unstable object that is.
From 1976 to 1998, astronomers observed start the South African Astronomical Observatory. During this period of time, they saw an increase across the J, H, K, and L bands, which are filters that allow certain infrared light to pass. However, the reason for this increase in infrared light was unknown at the time.

More Recently
After 1988, the brightness increased more rapidly than a linear trend in the J and H bands. Although this would typically lead observers to believe it is getting hotter, it’s highly unlikely that this is the cause of rapid brightness increase. One theory is that the cloud of dust absorbs blue light, so it is safe to say that this increase could just be the star’s actual brightness, seeing as how the dust could merely be getting destroyed. However this expansion of the cloud that surrounds Eta Carinae is not enough to account for the brightening. Instead it is possibly losing its mass or rotating at a different speed.
In 2005, astronomers discovered that Eta Carinae has at least one companion star. The more massive star, Eta Carinae A, is a blue star. The increase in temperature was most likely due to an overall increase in temperature of some component of the Eta Carinae system, which includes the cloud of dust and gas that surround the massive star.
Although this star has been studied so much by several types of telescopes, there is no theory that has explained what happened.
These changes have lead scientists to believe that the star is becoming more unstable and may be headed towards another eruptive phase, perhaps a second “great eruption.”

Fate
If Eta Carinae does indeed blow up into a supernova, would we be affected? Luckily for us, since we are about 7500 light years away, the radiation from the supernova would not be able to reach us.
These along with many others, are reason astronomers believe Eta Carinae to be a candidate for the next supernova to occur within our galaxy. Especially since there was a star in another galaxy that also seemed like a “supernova impostor” but then a few year later, boom
This star is heading towards instability and eruption and when it goes off it will create a blast so violent that its flash will briefly outshine the entire Milky Way.



Works Cited
Wikipedia:           http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eta_Carinae

Thursday, February 13, 2014

Happy Valentine's Day!

                In honor of Valentine’s Day, I give you the “Heart and Soul” nebulae. They are located 6,000 light years from earth in Cassiopeia, near the Perseus spiral arm of our galaxy. Enjoy!





Works Cited:


A Star's Age


                How do we determine the age of a star? Obviously, stars don’t have birthdays like we do, but their spin can tell us all we need to know to determine their age.
A technique called gyrochronology is used to calculate the age of a star. It utilizes a known age of a cluster of stars and its spin rate to determine the age of an isolated star. To measure the spin, astronomers look for changes in the brightness of the star, caused by dark spots, and determining the time it takes for that spot to reappear. Once that rotation period is known, it is used to determine its age by means of a mathematical formula of that only depends on the period (time) and the mass (or color) of the star.
This method was instrument in determining more precise ages of stars.




Works Cited:


Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Time - An Illusion or Not?

                According to the theory of general relativity, time can be defined as the fourth dimension in space, “traversable in any direction.” Meaning that all time (present, past, future) has no “sequential” or specific order and is coexisting together at once. This has led many to believe that time is simply an illusion. Something we have created in order to “measure the rate of change of the present.” However, many others believe that the present is real, and thus, not an illusion. Well, which is it?


                To think that the current present is real and that the past and future are not (seeing as how they cannot be measured) is universally acceptable. If something is in the past, in a sense, it’s not “tangible” any longer; and the same goes for the future. However, the present is “tangible” and can be measured. But if the present is real and as “time” continues, the present soon becomes the past and the future becomes the present. Does this mean that our idea of “time” is wrong?
                To this day there is no right or wrong answer to that question. The search and study to put an exact, real definition on “time” will continue. I found several articles and videos that make their best attempts to explain time and how it works.
                PBS aired an episode titled “The Fabric of the Cosmos: The Illusion of time,” where Brian Greene takes the viewers on a time-traveling adventure in order to gain a better understanding of the true meaning of time, where past, present, and future can all coexist at once.
                This interesting video captures the essence of how time can be thought of as an “illusion” based on the fact that time is different for different perspectives. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrqmMoI0wks



Works Cited:
Leigh Brasington:             http://www.leighb.com/notime.htm

Youtube:             http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrqmMoI0wks

Gliese 667C and its Possibly Habitable Super-Earths

Gliese 667Cc is one of seven (one unconfirmed) exoplanets that orbit Gliese 667C, one of the three stars in the system Gliese 667 located in the constellation Scorpius. The triple-star system Gliese 667 is located about 22.1 light years (or 6.97 pc) away from earth. That makes its parallax 0.143”. See below:
Of the seven planets, three have been categorized as super-Earths. Super-earths are basically exoplanets that are larger in mass than earth, yet smaller in mass than our gas giants, Uranus and Neptune. These super-Earths also lie in what we call the “habitable zone,” the region where temperatures are cool enough for water to exist in its liquid form. It is also believed that these planets are rocky, like earth, and have low levels of heavy elements, which is rare.


Gliese 667C is a red dwarf and is much fainter than the sun. Its surface temperature is about 3700K. Its absolute magnitude is 11.03, while the sun’s is 4.83. Its radius is about 0.42 solar radii (or 2.92×108 m). The distance from this star to its super-Earth, Gliese 667Cc, is only about 0.125 AU. That means that at the surface of this planet, Gliese 667C has an angular size of 1.79°. See below:
                Gliese 667Cc has a radius of about 1.76 earth radii (or 1.12×109 m). It is believed to be tidally locked to its parents star, meaning they continuously face each other in the same spot. This means it would have a hemisphere that is always bright and a hemisphere that is always dark. Meaning if I lived there, I could be a night owl throughout the day! Since it parent star is a part of a triple-star system, it is possible for all three stars to be visible in the daytime. Its orbital period is around 28 earth days (only one month). So technically, if life could exist on this planet, we could celebrate our birthday every month! Only down side to that is we’d all be very old, in Gliese 667Cc years. I’d be 264 years old!
                The system Gliese 667 has a right ascension of 17h18m57s. Since we’re in February now, the right ascension at midnight is 10h, meaning our field of visibility would span between 4h-16h; thus, we would not be able to see this system tonight at midnight. However, next month, in March, the right ascension at midnight would be 12h, giving us a field of visibility between 6h-18h; thus, we would be able to see it at midnight next month. So mark your calendars!


Works Cited:

Wikipedia:           http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_667
                           http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_667_Cc
                           http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-Earth

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Pluto, The Ninth "Planet"?

I remember when the news first came out about Pluto no longer being a planet in our solar system I felt a little bad for Pluto. No longer a planet…? But why!?! Well, to this day I never actually bothered to read about the specific details on this new definition of a “planet” in our solar system. I also didn't really know much about this icy, now, dwarf planet. Below is a summary of interesting facts about Pluto and the new definitions of celestial bodies orbiting our sun and what it really means to be a major planet in our solar system.
History & Discovery of Pluto
On February 18th, 1930, astronomer Clyde W. Tombaugh (with the help of William H. Pickering) discovered the planet Pluto at the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona. However, he was not the first one to observe this planet. In 1906, Percival Lowell, the founder of the Lowell Observatory, began an intense hunt to search for this “planet X.” Although he had predicted its location, the search to find the planet continued even after his passing. Before being discovered, images of Pluto had been captured, although they were not recognized as such; some even as early as August 20th, 1909, by the Yerkes Observatory. The search dissipated around the time of Lowell’s death. It wasn't until 1929 when that search resumed. The hunt was then handed over to Tombaugh, who was twenty-three years old at the time. His responsibility was to image the night sky, using pairs of photographs taken weeks apart, and then to determine whether any objects shifted position. After almost a year, on February 18th, 1930, Tombaugh discovered a possible moving object. After these images were confirmed with more photographs, on March 13th, 1930, the discovery was telegraphed to the Harvard College Observatory.
This discovery of “planet X” made major headlines. Since they discovered it, the Lowell Observatory had the right to name the planet. They received several suggestions, but settled on the name “Pluto” (mythological Roman god of the underworld), which was initially proposed by an eleven year old schoolgirl from Oxford, England named Venetia Burney. She suggested it to her grandfather, who then passed the suggestion to Professor Herbert Hall Turner, who then sent the suggestion to the United States. The planet’s name became Pluto officially on March 24th, 1930 and was announced on May 1st, 1930. As a reward Venetia received five pounds.

Pluto Characteristics 
Pluto is located about 39.5 astronomical units (AU) away from the sun; in other units, 3.67 billion miles (mi), or 5.91 billion kilometers (km) away! Its diameter measures about 1485 mi (or 2390 km). That is virtually less than half the size of small Mercury, slightly smaller than our known moons, and about half the width of the US! Pluto’s gravitational force is about one-fifteenth of that on Earth. This means that a 150 pound person on Earth would weigh only 10 pounds on Pluto. So skinny! Pluto’s average surface temperature is around 50 Kelvin (K), which is about -223° Celsius, or -369° Fahrenheit. Its surface is believed to be rocky, covered with frost and ice and composed of methane and nitrogen. Pluto orbits the sun in 248 Earth years. It completes a complete rotation (1 Pluto day) in 6.375 Earth days. And interestingly enough, its rotational orbit is retrograde, that is, it rotates from east to west. Pluto orbits the sun in an ellipse, just as the other planets; however, its orbital plane is inclined from the others by about 17.16 degrees. Its orbit is so highly eccentric that it can reach distances as far as about 50 AU from the sun, and for 20 years of its orbital period, it gets closer to the sun than Neptune. Pluto is located in the Kuiper Belt, which is an immense disc-like band, located beyond Neptune, that contains small, icy object or “debris” that orbit the sun.

Pluto’s Moons  
In 1978, Pluto’s moon, Charon, was the first to be discovered, at the United States Naval Observatory Flagstaff Station (NOFS). Named after the Greek mythological demon who ferried souls to the underworld, Charon measures about 737 mi (or 1186 km) in diameter. That’s practically half the size of Pluto! Basically making it a plutonian co-equal. In fact, because of its big size (relative to Pluto), many scientists refer to Pluto and Charon as a double dwarf planet or binary system. Their distance from each other is only 12200 mi (or 19640 km). Charon also has the same rotational period as Pluto (6.375 days) – in fact, the two are “tidally locked  in a synchronous orbit” which means that they are continuously facing each other, hovering the same spot on one another.
Pluto and its five moons.
               P4 is Kerberos and P5 is Styx.
In 2005, the Hubble Space Telescope helped discover two other moons: Nix and Hydra. Nix has a mean diameter between 29-85 mi (or 46-137 km), while Hydra between 38-104 mi (or 61-167 km) in diameter. In 2011 and 2012, Kerberos and Styx  were discovered, respectively. Tiny Kerberos measures between 8-21 mi (or 13-34 km) in diameter, and Styx even smaller between 6-16 mi (or 10-25 km).



What does it means to be a “planet"?
Starting in 2000, celestial bodies similar to Pluto’s size and orbit were discovered. For example, in 2005 Eris was discovered by Mike Brown.Eris is located beyond Pluto and is larger in size. It measures 1445 mi (or 2326 km) in diameter and is 27% more massive than Pluto. The fact that Eris is more massive than Pluto and has a similar orbit makes it clear that it, too, deserves to have the title of “planet” as well. However, since Eris is one of the many objects that are as large or larger than Pluto also with similar orbits, this means that the total number of major planets in our solar system would expand. Realizing that Pluto had to be reclassified, discussion was underway about the politically correct definition of a planet in our solar system. The International Astronomical Union (IAU), which is the group responsible for naming objects in space, decided that Pluto and other objects like it were not truly planets. Their formal decision on the definition of celestial bodies was approved on Thursday, August 24th, 2006 at its General Assembly in Prague, and is as follows: 

IAU Resolution: Definition of a Planet in the Solar System
Contemporary observations are changing our understanding of planetary systems, and it is important that our nomenclature for objects reflect our current understanding. This applies, in particular, to the designation 'planets'. The word "planet" originally described "wanderers" that were known only as moving lights in the sky. Recent discoveries lead us to create a new definition, which we can make using currently available scientific information.
RESOLUTION 5A
The IAU therefore resolves that planets and other bodies in our Solar System, except satellites, be defined into three distinct categories in the following way:
(1) A "planet"1 is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
(2) A "dwarf planet" is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape2, (c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.
(3) All other objects3, except satellites, orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as "Small Solar System Bodies".
1The eight planets are: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.
2An IAU process will be established to assign borderline objects into either dwarf planet and other categories.
3These currently include most of the Solar System asteroids, most Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), comets, and other small bodies.
RESOLUTION 5B
Insert the word "classical" before the word "planet" in Resolution 5A, Section (1), and footnote 1. Thus reading:
(1) A classical "planet"1 is a celestial body . . .
and
1The eight classical planets are: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.
IAU Resolution: Pluto

RESOLUTION 6A
The IAU further resolves:
Pluto is a "dwarf planet" by the above definition and is recognized as the prototype of a new category of trans-Neptunian objects.
RESOLUTION 6B
The following sentence is added to Resolution 6A:
This category is to be called "plutonian objects."




Under the IAU definition, Pluto was no longer a “classical planet,” but was now a “dwarf planet” since it does not meet the third requirement (to clear the neighborhood around its orbit). However, Pluto is not alone. Obviously many other objects also fell into that category, such as Eris, Ceres, Haumea and Makemake. Along with several other bodies in the Kuiper belt.





Artist's portrayal of New Horizons.
 New Horizons
On January 19th, 2006, NASA launched New Horizons, the first mission aimed for Pluto. The spacecraft is set to fly out to the edge of our solar system, to observe Pluto, its moons, and other objects in the Kuiper belt. Five months will be dedicated to studying Pluto and its moons and afterward it will study other objects in the Kuiper belt. It is scheduled to reach Pluto on July 14th, 2015. Next year! The data that will be collected will be much more than we’ve had about objects that far out in space.
If still functioning, in December 2038, it would reach 100 AU from the Sun! The space capsule is about the size of a grand piano and is rumored to carry some ashes of Pluto’s discoverer, Clyde Tombaugh! Hmm… Gross or sweet? Who’s to say?





Works Cited

Nasa:   http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/plutofact.html
           http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/what-is-pluto-58.html#.Uuc3XdLTnnA
IAU:    http://www.iau.org/public_press/news/detail/iau0602/
Time:   http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/07/13/why-pluto-now-has-five-moons-but-its-still-not-a-planet/
NBC News:     http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14498750/#.Uuc0ktLTnnB
National Geographic:     http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/08/060824-pluto-planet.html
Library of Commerce:    http://www.loc.gov/rr/scitech/mysteries/pluto.html
Space:     http://www.space.com/43-pluto-the-ninth-planet-that-was-a-dwarf.html
Seasky:   www.seasky.org/solar-system/pluto-charon.html
Wikipedia:        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto
                        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Horizons